PAWAN KUMAR vs SUKANTA PANDIT — 76/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--Full Satisfaction on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070002952026

Filing Number

279/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Full Satisfaction

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKANTA PANDIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 76/2026 (Pawan Kumar v. Sukanta Pandit) The court decreed an ex-parte suit in favor of plaintiff Pawan Kumar for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan on 11/02/2024. The defendant failed to appear; the plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and promissory note proved the loan obligation. The defendant must repay within three months or face execution proceedings. The court also imposed a Rs. 75/- penalty on the plaintiff for non-compliance with Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Further Order

    Scc

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Scc

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 76/2026 (Pawan Kumar v. Sukanta Pandit) The court decreed an ex-parte suit in favor of plaintiff Pawan Kumar for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan on 11/02/2024. The defendant failed to appear; the plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and promissory note proved the loan obligation. The defendant must repay within three months or face execution proceedings. The court also imposed a Rs. 75/- penalty on the plaintiff for non-compliance with Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case