PAWAN KUMAR vs SUKANTA PANDIT — 58/2026

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE on 20th April 2026.

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070001902026

Case disposed

Filing Number

183/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

58/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-SCC

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123

Petitioner(s)

PAWAN KUMAR

Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

SUKANTA PANDIT

Hearing History

Judge: 7-SCC

20-04-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Exparte Hearing

26-02-2026

Exparte Hearing

17-02-2026

Exparte Hearing

16-02-2026

Exparte Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
order

Case Summary: Pawan Kumar v. Sukanta Pandit (SCC 58/2026) The court decreed the suit ex-parte in favor of plaintiff Pawan Kumar for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent to defendant Sukanta Pandit as an accommodation loan on 23/12/2023. The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence and promissory note (Exhibit-1) sufficient to prove the case, and ordered the defendant to repay the amount within three months or face execution proceedings. The plaintiff was also penalized Rs. 75/- for non-compliance with the Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pawan Kumar v. Sukanta Pandit (SCC 58/2026) The court decreed the suit ex-parte in favor of plaintiff Pawan Kumar for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent to defendant Sukanta Pandit as an accommodation loan on 23/12/2023. The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence and promissory note (Exhibit-1) sufficient to prove the case, and ordered the defendant to repay the amount within three months or face execution proceedings. The plaintiff was also penalized Rs. 75/- for non-compliance with the Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case