PAWAN KUMAR vs SUKANTA PANDIT — 58/2026

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070001902026

Filing Number

183/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

58/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKANTA PANDIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    Case Summary: Pawan Kumar v. Sukanta Pandit (SCC 58/2026) The court decreed the suit ex-parte in favor of plaintiff Pawan Kumar for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent to defendant Sukanta Pandit as an accommodation loan on 23/12/2023. The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence and promissory note (Exhibit-1) sufficient to prove the case, and ordered the defendant to repay the amount within three months or face execution proceedings. The plaintiff was also penalized Rs. 75/- for non-compliance with the Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 58/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pawan Kumar v. Sukanta Pandit (SCC 58/2026) The court decreed the suit ex-parte in favor of plaintiff Pawan Kumar for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent to defendant Sukanta Pandit as an accommodation loan on 23/12/2023. The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence and promissory note (Exhibit-1) sufficient to prove the case, and ordered the defendant to repay the amount within three months or face execution proceedings. The plaintiff was also penalized Rs. 75/- for non-compliance with the Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case