PAWAN KUMAR vs SUKANTA PANDIT — 57/2026

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070001892026

Filing Number

182/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

57/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKANTA PANDIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    The court decreed Pawan Kumar's suit against Sukanta Pandit for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan on 09/11/2023. The court accepted Kumar's unchallenged testimony and the promissory note evidence, finding he had proven his case. Pandit was ordered to pay the decretal amount within three months, failing which Kumar may execute the decree; Kumar was also penalized Rs. 75/- for non-compliance with Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Scc

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court decreed Pawan Kumar's suit against Sukanta Pandit for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan on 09/11/2023. The court accepted Kumar's unchallenged testimony and the promissory note evidence, finding he had proven his case. Pandit was ordered to pay the decretal amount within three months, failing which Kumar may execute the decree; Kumar was also penalized Rs. 75/- for non-compliance with Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case