PAWAN KUMAR vs AJAY KUMAR JHA — 56/2026

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070001882026

Filing Number

181/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

56/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAY KUMAR JHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    Case 56/2026 Summary The court decreed Pawan Kumar's suit against Ajay Kumar Jha for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- advanced as an accommodation loan on 31/01/2024. The court accepted the unchallenged testimony of the plaintiff's witness and the promissory note evidence, finding the plaintiff proved his case. The defendant must pay the decretal amount within three months or face execution proceedings; the court also imposed a Rs. 75/- penalty on the plaintiff for failing to file a money lending license under the Bengal Money Lender's Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 56/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 56/2026 Summary The court decreed Pawan Kumar's suit against Ajay Kumar Jha for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- advanced as an accommodation loan on 31/01/2024. The court accepted the unchallenged testimony of the plaintiff's witness and the promissory note evidence, finding the plaintiff proved his case. The defendant must pay the decretal amount within three months or face execution proceedings; the court also imposed a Rs. 75/- penalty on the plaintiff for failing to file a money lending license under the Bengal Money Lender's Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case