STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs GOURI DEVI AND OTHERS — 3924/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341/323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBSP050104472025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10397/2025
Filing Date
22-12-2025
Registration No
3924/2025
Registration Date
22-12-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, South 24 Parganas
Judge
4-CJM
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. GOVT. PP.
Respondent(s)
GOURI DEVI AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CJM
Disposed
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
Evidence
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-12-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore acquitted accused Gouri Devi and Sunil Prosad of charges under IPC Sections 341/323/114 (wrongful restraint and voluntarily causing hurt). The court found that the prosecution fatally failed to establish its case: the complainant did not appear despite repeated summons, prosecution witnesses testified they had no knowledge of the incident, no medical evidence was presented, and the investigating officer merely filed the FIR without substantive corroboration. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof and the prosecution did not establish the essential ingredients of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore acquitted accused Gouri Devi and Sunil Prosad of charges under IPC Sections 341/323/114 (wrongful restraint and voluntarily causing hurt). The court found that the prosecution fatally failed to establish its case: the complainant did not appear despite repeated summons, prosecution witnesses testified they had no knowledge of the incident, no medical evidence was presented, and the investigating officer merely filed the FIR without substantive corroboration. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof and the prosecution did not establish the essential ingredients of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts