STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs GOURI DEVI AND OTHERS — 3924/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341/323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBSP050104472025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

10397/2025

Filing Date

22-12-2025

Registration No

3924/2025

Registration Date

22-12-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, South 24 Parganas

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 341/323

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Adv. GOVT. PP.

Respondent(s)

GOURI DEVI AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CJM

01-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

23-03-2026

Evidence

24-02-2026

Evidence

29-12-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore acquitted accused Gouri Devi and Sunil Prosad of charges under IPC Sections 341/323/114 (wrongful restraint and voluntarily causing hurt). The court found that the prosecution fatally failed to establish its case: the complainant did not appear despite repeated summons, prosecution witnesses testified they had no knowledge of the incident, no medical evidence was presented, and the investigating officer merely filed the FIR without substantive corroboration. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof and the prosecution did not establish the essential ingredients of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore acquitted accused Gouri Devi and Sunil Prosad of charges under IPC Sections 341/323/114 (wrongful restraint and voluntarily causing hurt). The court found that the prosecution fatally failed to establish its case: the complainant did not appear despite repeated summons, prosecution witnesses testified they had no knowledge of the incident, no medical evidence was presented, and the investigating officer merely filed the FIR without substantive corroboration. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof and the prosecution did not establish the essential ingredients of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, South 24 Parganas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case