STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs RAJEN MD RAJEN AND ANOTHER — 3857/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324/114. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBSP050102852025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

10240/2025

Filing Date

12-12-2025

Registration No

3857/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, South 24 Parganas

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 324/114

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Adv. GOVT. PP.

Respondent(s)

RAJEN MD RAJEN AND ANOTHER

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CJM

06-05-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

22-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted both accused persons (Rajen @ Md. Rajen and Nilu @ Yeasmin Parveen) of charges under Section 324/114 IPC for allegedly assaulting the complainant with a hockey stick. The court found critical contradictions in prosecution witness testimony—the complainant stated she was assaulted in her written complaint but testified her daughter was assaulted during trial. Key evidence gaps (missing IO, doctor, medical documents, and independent witnesses) and the victim's testimony that she "knows nothing" about the incident fatally undermined the prosecution's case. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof, and the prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

22-01-2026
order by court
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted both accused persons (Rajen @ Md. Rajen and Nilu @ Yeasmin Parveen) of charges under Section 324/114 IPC for allegedly assaulting the complainant with a hockey stick. The court found critical contradictions in prosecution witness testimony—the complainant stated she was assaulted in her written complaint but testified her daughter was assaulted during trial. Key evidence gaps (missing IO, doctor, medical documents, and independent witnesses) and the victim's testimony that she "knows nothing" about the incident fatally undermined the prosecution's case. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof, and the prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, South 24 Parganas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case