UCO Bank vs NIVEDITA SEN AND ANOTHER — 83/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED EXPARTE on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

MISC CASE

CNR: WBSP050013102026

Filing Number

1307/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, South 24 Parganas

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED EXPARTE

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UCO Bank

    Adv. DEBJANI BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIVEDITA SEN AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    order by courtView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate (Alipore) granted the creditor's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a residential property (Flat No. 1B, Ballygunge Place, Kolkata) valued at ₹1.5 crore, finding all statutory requirements satisfied including proper notice delivery and borrower default. The court appointed the Seal Bailiff as commissioner to take possession after serving 7-day advance notice, with police assistance if needed, and directed the borrower may file objections before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 83/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate (Alipore) granted the creditor's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a residential property (Flat No. 1B, Ballygunge Place, Kolkata) valued at ₹1.5 crore, finding all statutory requirements satisfied including proper notice delivery and borrower default. The court appointed the Seal Bailiff as commissioner to take possession after serving 7-day advance notice, with police assistance if needed, and directed the borrower may file objections before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case