STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs MADHU PRASAD AHIR — 153/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341/323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBSP050002262026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

225/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

153/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, South 24 Parganas

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 341/323

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Adv. GOVT. PP.

Respondent(s)

MADHU PRASAD AHIR

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CJM

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Evidence

22-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Judgement

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Alipore acquitted Madhu Prasad Ahir of all charges under IPC sections 341/323/354/506/509 (wrongful restraint, causing hurt, outraging modesty, criminal intimidation, and word insult). The court found that the prosecution failed to provide cogent and reliable evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with only one prosecution witness who claimed to know nothing about the case, the complainant failing to testify, and no corroborating documentary evidence. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

22-01-2026
order by court
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Alipore acquitted Madhu Prasad Ahir of all charges under IPC sections 341/323/354/506/509 (wrongful restraint, causing hurt, outraging modesty, criminal intimidation, and word insult). The court found that the prosecution failed to provide cogent and reliable evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with only one prosecution witness who claimed to know nothing about the case, the complainant failing to testify, and no corroborating documentary evidence. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, South 24 Parganas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case