STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs MADHU PRASAD AHIR — 153/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341/323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBSP050002262026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
225/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
153/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipur, South 24 Parganas
Judge
4-CJM
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. GOVT. PP.
Respondent(s)
MADHU PRASAD AHIR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CJM
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Alipore acquitted Madhu Prasad Ahir of all charges under IPC sections 341/323/354/506/509 (wrongful restraint, causing hurt, outraging modesty, criminal intimidation, and word insult). The court found that the prosecution failed to provide cogent and reliable evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with only one prosecution witness who claimed to know nothing about the case, the complainant failing to testify, and no corroborating documentary evidence. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Alipore acquitted Madhu Prasad Ahir of all charges under IPC sections 341/323/354/506/509 (wrongful restraint, causing hurt, outraging modesty, criminal intimidation, and word insult). The court found that the prosecution failed to provide cogent and reliable evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with only one prosecution witness who claimed to know nothing about the case, the complainant failing to testify, and no corroborating documentary evidence. The court held that mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts