STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs AMARESH MONDAL AND ANR — 113/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,325,307,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

Sessions Trial

CNR: WBSP040003442024

Case disposed

Filing Number

143/2024

Filing Date

22-05-2024

Registration No

113/2025

Registration Date

23-09-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Alipur, South 24 Parganas

Judge

1-17 Th ADJ

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,325,307,506,34

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Adv. P.P

Respondent(s)

AMARESH MONDAL AND ANR

TUMPA MONDAL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-17 Th ADJ

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Argument / Further Argument

09-03-2026

Evidence

06-03-2026

Evidence

02-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Alipore, acquitted both accused persons—Amaresh Mondal and Tumpa Mondal—of charges under IPC Sections 325/307/506/34 (voluntarily causing hurt, attempt to murder, criminal intimidation, and criminal act by common intention). The court found that the prosecution miserably failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant/injured party contradicted the prosecution narrative and provided no substantive evidence implicating the accused. The court held the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt, comparing it to "a blank and barren canvas" on which no guilt portrait could be painted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Alipore, acquitted both accused persons—Amaresh Mondal and Tumpa Mondal—of charges under IPC Sections 325/307/506/34 (voluntarily causing hurt, attempt to murder, criminal intimidation, and criminal act by common intention). The court found that the prosecution miserably failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant/injured party contradicted the prosecution narrative and provided no substantive evidence implicating the accused. The court held the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt, comparing it to "a blank and barren canvas" on which no guilt portrait could be painted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Alipur, South 24 Parganas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case