STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs Yeamin Sardar — 221/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,304B,34. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Trial

CNR: WBSP040002602016

Filing Number

221/2016

Filing Date

16-Feb-2016

Registration No

221/2016

Registration Date

06-Jun-2017

Court

Additional District Judge, Alipur, South 24 Parganas

Judge

3-8th Ftc

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,304B,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yeamin Sardar

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order by courtView PDF

    Case 221/2016 (State of West Bengal v. Yeamin Sardar) was adjourned to 20-07-2026 for appointment of the Public Prosecutor in-charge and examination-in-chief of the Investigating Officer's witness affidavit, with evidence to follow. All three accused appeared through counsel under Section 317 CrPC; no witnesses were present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    8th Ftc

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order by courtView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    8th Ftc

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Order by courtView PDF

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Order by courtView PDF

  10. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  11. 27-Aug-2025

    Order by courtView PDF

  12. 27-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Report

    8th Ftc

  13. 11-Jul-2025

    Order by courtView PDF

  14. 11-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Report

    8th Ftc

  15. 04-Jun-2025

    Order by courtView PDF

  16. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  17. 13-May-2025

    Order by courtView PDF

  18. 13-May-2025

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  19. 20-Feb-2025

    Order by courtView PDF

  20. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  21. 05-Dec-2024

    Order by courtView PDF

  22. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  23. 30-Aug-2024

    Order by courtView PDF

  24. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  25. 27-Jun-2024

    Order by courtView PDF

  26. 27-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  27. 08-Apr-2024

    Order by courtView PDF

  28. 08-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  29. 21-Feb-2024

    Order by courtView PDF

  30. 21-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  31. 03-Jan-2024

    Order by courtView PDF

  32. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  33. 02-Jan-2024

    Order by courtView PDF

  34. 02-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  35. 03-Oct-2023

    Order by courtView PDF

  36. 03-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  37. 12-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  38. 09-Apr-2020

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    8th Ftc

  39. 14-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  40. 12-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  41. 07-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  42. 31-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  43. 31-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  44. 27-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  45. 15-May-2019

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  46. 04-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  47. 13-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  48. 24-Dec-2018

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  49. 13-Nov-2018

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  50. 31-Aug-2018

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  51. 30-Jul-2018

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  52. 28-May-2018

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  53. 19-Mar-2018

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  54. 18-Dec-2017

    Evidence

    8th Ftc

  55. 30-Aug-2017

    Further Evidence

    8th Ftc

  56. 04-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 16-Feb-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 221/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case 221/2016 (State of West Bengal v. Yeamin Sardar) was adjourned to 20-07-2026 for appointment of the Public Prosecutor in-charge and examination-in-chief of the Investigating Officer's witness affidavit, with evidence to follow. All three accused appeared through counsel under Section 317 CrPC; no witnesses were present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case