PROSENJIT CHATTERJEE vs PURBALI HAZRA — 3555/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX PARTE on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

MAT SUIT

CNR: WBSP010175452025

Filing Number

10814/2025

Filing Date

12-Dec-2025

Registration No

3555/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Alipur, South 24 Pgs

Judge

2-1st ADJ

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX PARTE

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PROSENJIT CHATTERJEE

    Adv. SAYANTAN BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PURBALI HAZRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

    Case Summary: Prosenjit Chatterjee v. Purbali Hazra (Mat Suit 3555/2025) The court granted Prosenjit Chatterjee's divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on grounds of desertion. The marriage, solemnized on 08.07.2022, broke down due to care obligations toward respective mothers; the respondent remained at her parental home from May 2023 onward and refused to resume cohabitation despite petitioner's attempts at reconciliation. The court found both elements of desertion—factum of separation and animus deserendi—were established through unchallenged evidence, as the respondent failed to contest the ex parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Order by CourtView PDF

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3555/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Prosenjit Chatterjee v. Purbali Hazra (Mat Suit 3555/2025) The court granted Prosenjit Chatterjee's divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on grounds of desertion. The marriage, solemnized on 08.07.2022, broke down due to care obligations toward respective mothers; the respondent remained at her parental home from May 2023 onward and refused to resume cohabitation despite petitioner's attempts at reconciliation. The court found both elements of desertion—factum of separation and animus deserendi—were established through unchallenged evidence, as the respondent failed to contest the ex parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case