KASTURI BISOI vs SUBHODEEP JANA — 3029/2025

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 25(i). Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX PARTE on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

MAT SUIT

CNR: WBSP010149632025

Filing Number

9208/2025

Filing Date

24-Oct-2025

Registration No

3029/2025

Registration Date

24-Oct-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Alipur, South 24 Pgs

Judge

2-1st ADJ

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX PARTE

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 25(i)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KASTURI BISOI

    Adv. MALAY KANTI NATUA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBHODEEP JANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

    Case Summary The court granted Kasturi Bisoi's petition for marriage annulment under Section 25(1) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The marriage registered on 30.04.2025 was declared null and void because it remained unconsummated due to the respondent Subhodeep Jana's wilful refusal to cohabit or establish matrimonial life, evidenced by his admission that the parties never lived together and his rejection of the petitioner as his wife. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Order by CourtView PDF

  10. 24-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3029/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court granted Kasturi Bisoi's petition for marriage annulment under Section 25(1) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The marriage registered on 30.04.2025 was declared null and void because it remained unconsummated due to the respondent Subhodeep Jana's wilful refusal to cohabit or establish matrimonial life, evidenced by his admission that the parties never lived together and his rejection of the petitioner as his wife. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case