SIDDHA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/S. RAJWADA DEVELOPER AND ORS — 19/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

TITLE SUIT

CNR: WBSP010145952019

Filing Number

7245/2019

Filing Date

03-Oct-2019

Registration No

19/2019

Registration Date

03-Oct-2019

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Alipur, South 24 Pgs

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIDDHA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. SABYASACHI MONDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. RAJWADA DEVELOPER AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  4. 19-Nov-2025

    Ex parte Hearing

    District Judge

  5. 09-Sep-2025

    Order by CourtView PDF

    The District Judge issued an order on 09-09-2025 in case TS-19 of 2019 directing the plaintiff to show cause by 19-11-2025 why the case should not be dismissed due to non-compliance with court orders. The plaintiff failed to appear for the ex-parte hearing despite repeated calls and took no steps in the case, prompting the dismissal warning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 09-Sep-2025

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  7. 07-Jul-2025

    Order by CourtView PDF

  8. 07-Jul-2025

    Ex parte Hearing

    District Judge

  9. 17-May-2025

    Order by CourtView PDF

  10. 17-May-2025

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  11. 29-Mar-2025

    Order by CourtView PDF

  12. 29-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  13. 14-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  14. 23-Dec-2024

    Order by CourtView PDF

  15. 23-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  16. 08-Nov-2024

    Order by CourtView PDF

  17. 08-Nov-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  18. 09-Sep-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  19. 09-Aug-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  20. 11-Jul-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  21. 13-Jun-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  22. 10-May-2024

    Order by CourtView PDF

  23. 10-May-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  24. 08-Apr-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  25. 11-Mar-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  26. 08-Feb-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  27. 08-Jan-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  28. 25-Sep-2023

    Order by CourtView PDF

  29. 25-Sep-2023

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  30. 12-Jun-2023

    Order by CourtView PDF

  31. 12-Jun-2023

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  32. 14-Mar-2023

    Order by CourtView PDF

  33. 14-Mar-2023

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  34. 24-Nov-2022

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  35. 22-Jul-2022

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  36. 05-Apr-2022

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  37. 18-Dec-2021

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  38. 03-Aug-2021

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  39. 15-Mar-2021

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  40. 21-Sep-2020

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  41. 28-Apr-2020

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  42. 26-Feb-2020

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  43. 13-Dec-2019

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  44. 03-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 03-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge issued an order on 09-09-2025 in case TS-19 of 2019 directing the plaintiff to show cause by 19-11-2025 why the case should not be dismissed due to non-compliance with court orders. The plaintiff failed to appear for the ex-parte hearing despite repeated calls and took no steps in the case, prompting the dismissal warning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case