STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs BISHAL KUMAR PASWAN AND ORS — 29/2023
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 21(C). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Special Court Cases (NDPS)
CNR: WBSP010127692023
Filing Number
6535/2023
Filing Date
05-Sep-2023
Registration No
29/2023
Registration Date
05-Sep-2023
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Alipur, South 24 Pgs
Judge
5-4th ADJ
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. P.P
Respondent(s)
-
1.BISHAL KUMAR PASWAN AND ORS
-
2.DHANANJOY PASWAN
-
3.GULSHAN KUMAR PASWAN @ GULSAN KUMAR
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
07-Jun-2025
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
24-Mar-2025
Order by CourtView PDF
Bail Denied. The court rejected the bail application of accused Rajkumar Halder @ Siraj in this NDPS case, finding that commercial quantity of narcotic substance was involved. The rejection was based on the bar provided under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, despite the defense counsel's arguments that the accused was falsely implicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
20-Jan-2025
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
26-Jun-2024
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
18-May-2024
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
06-Mar-2024
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
18-Jan-2024
Evidence
4th ADJ
-
12-Dec-2023
Production
4th ADJ
-
28-Nov-2023
Production
4th ADJ
-
17-Oct-2023
Production
4th ADJ
-
03-Oct-2023
Production
4th ADJ
-
19-Sep-2023
Production
4th ADJ
-
05-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 29/2023
Bail Denied. The court rejected the bail application of accused Rajkumar Halder @ Siraj in this NDPS case, finding that commercial quantity of narcotic substance was involved. The rejection was based on the bar provided under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, despite the defense counsel's arguments that the accused was falsely implicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts