SMT. MADHU CHHANDA DATTA AND ANR vs SMT. SHAMPA SAHA ALIAS SHAMPA DUTTA — 149/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O-43,R-1(r). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED on 10th April 2026.
MISC. APPEAL
CNR: WBSP010068182025
Filing Number
4449/2025
Filing Date
16-May-2025
Registration No
149/2025
Registration Date
16-May-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Alipur, South 24 Pgs
Judge
2-1st ADJ
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. MADHU CHHANDA DATTA AND ANR
Adv. CHITRITA ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. SHAMPA SAHA ALIAS SHAMPA DUTTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary of Misc. Appeal No. 149 of 2025 The appellate court dismissed the defendants' appeal challenging the trial court's order granting a status quo injunction in a property dispute involving premises at 4D Lansdowne Place, Kolkata. The court upheld the injunction, holding that complex questions regarding title, adoption, inheritance, and possession cannot be conclusively determined at the interlocutory stage and require full trial with evidence. The status quo order was deemed appropriate to preserve the property pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Order by CourtView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Order by CourtView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Order by CourtView PDF
-
18-Dec-2025
Order by CourtView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
Order by CourtView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
Order by CourtView PDF
-
17-Jul-2025
Order by CourtView PDF
-
20-May-2025
Order by CourtView PDF
-
16-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 149/2025
Summary of Misc. Appeal No. 149 of 2025 The appellate court dismissed the defendants' appeal challenging the trial court's order granting a status quo injunction in a property dispute involving premises at 4D Lansdowne Place, Kolkata. The court upheld the injunction, holding that complex questions regarding title, adoption, inheritance, and possession cannot be conclusively determined at the interlocutory stage and require full trial with evidence. The status quo order was deemed appropriate to preserve the property pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts