SANTOSH KUNDU vs KANAD GHOSH AND ORS — 31/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O-43. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
MISC. APPEAL
CNR: WBSP010017652026
Filing Number
1078/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Alipur, South 24 Pgs
Judge
1-District Judge
Last updated 09-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSH KUNDU
Adv. RUDRESWAR MONDAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.KANAD GHOSH AND ORS
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Order by CourtView PDF
Summary: The District Court of South 24-Parganas granted an ad-interim temporary injunction in favor of appellant Sri Santosh Kundu, valid until 05.03.2026, restraining respondents 1 and 2 from creating any third-party interest or transferring/encumbering the suit property. The court found prima facie that the appellant resides in the property and risks irreparable loss if third-party interests are created. Notice has been issued to respondents to show cause within 15 days why the injunction should not be made permanent, with the matter scheduled for further hearing on 05.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Feb-2026
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2026
Summary: The District Court of South 24-Parganas granted an ad-interim temporary injunction in favor of appellant Sri Santosh Kundu, valid until 05.03.2026, restraining respondents 1 and 2 from creating any third-party interest or transferring/encumbering the suit property. The court found prima facie that the appellant resides in the property and risks irreparable loss if third-party interests are created. Notice has been issued to respondents to show cause within 15 days why the injunction should not be made permanent, with the matter scheduled for further hearing on 05.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts