STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs RANJIT DAS@KALU — 3/2020

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 21(c). Status: Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C Next hearing 15-May-2026

Special Court Cases (NDPS)

CNR: WBSP010000912020

Filing Number

70/2020

Filing Date

02-Jan-2020

Registration No

3/2020

Registration Date

02-Jan-2020

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Alipur, South 24 Pgs

Judge

5-4th ADJ

Last updated 13-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1668

Police Station

NARENDRAPUR

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 21(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. PUBLIC POSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT DAS@KALU

Case History

  1. 15-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Feb-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

    Summary: In NDPS case NDPS-3/20, the court closed the prosecution's evidence after finding that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution failed to produce additional witnesses beyond the four already examined. Considering the case's age (arising from 2009), the court ruled that granting further chances would cause gross injustice. The case is adjourned to 11.3.2026 for examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    4th ADJ

  4. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  5. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  6. 14-May-2025

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  7. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  8. 30-Jan-2025

    Order by CourtView PDF

  9. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  10. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  11. 16-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  12. 27-Aug-2024

    Order by CourtView PDF

  13. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  14. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  15. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  16. 29-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  17. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  18. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  19. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  20. 17-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  21. 17-May-2023

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  22. 16-May-2023

    Order by CourtView PDF

  23. 16-May-2023

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  24. 15-May-2023

    Order by CourtView PDF

  25. 15-May-2023

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  26. 13-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    4th ADJ

  27. 02-Aug-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  28. 28-Jun-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  29. 12-May-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  30. 25-Mar-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  31. 17-Feb-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  32. 06-Dec-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  33. 18-Nov-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  34. 22-Sep-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  35. 09-Sep-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  36. 17-Aug-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  37. 16-Jun-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  38. 19-May-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  39. 09-Apr-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    4th ADJ

  40. 24-Feb-2021

    Production

    4th ADJ

  41. 25-Jan-2021

    Production

    4th ADJ

  42. 23-Dec-2020

    Production

    4th ADJ

  43. 25-Nov-2020

    Production

    4th ADJ

  44. 05-Oct-2020

    Production

    4th ADJ

  45. 27-Mar-2020

    Production

    4th ADJ

  46. 12-Mar-2020

    Production

    4th ADJ

  47. 26-Feb-2020

    Production

    4th ADJ

  48. 11-Feb-2020

    Production

    4th ADJ

  49. 27-Jan-2020

    Production

    4th ADJ

  50. 10-Jan-2020

    Production

    4th ADJ

  51. 02-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 02-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In NDPS case NDPS-3/20, the court closed the prosecution's evidence after finding that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution failed to produce additional witnesses beyond the four already examined. Considering the case's age (arising from 2009), the court ruled that granting further chances would cause gross injustice. The case is adjourned to 11.3.2026 for examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case