State of West Bengal vs Aditya Bauri and others — 926/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188,447,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th April 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBPU060013362023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1336/2023
Filing Date
29-11-2023
Registration No
926/2023
Registration Date
29-11-2023
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
4-JM I
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
102
Police Station
KASHIPUR
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. APP in charge
Respondent(s)
Aditya Bauri and others
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JM I
Disposed
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
E.R of W.W and Evidence
Evidence and 313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 30-03-2026 | E.R of W.W and Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence and 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Aditya Bouri and Madhusudan Bouri of charges under IPC Sections 188/447/506/34, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the sole material witness (PW1) testimony was unreliable, uncorroborated by independent witnesses, and undermined by admissions of an underlying civil land dispute, weak evidence regarding criminal trespass intent, and absence of proof regarding the Section 188 order violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Aditya Bouri and Madhusudan Bouri of charges under IPC Sections 188/447/506/34, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the sole material witness (PW1) testimony was unreliable, uncorroborated by independent witnesses, and undermined by admissions of an underlying civil land dispute, weak evidence regarding criminal trespass intent, and absence of proof regarding the Section 188 order violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts