Heli Swarnakar vs Raycharan Swarnakar — 131/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Uncontested--Withdrawn on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Case

CNR: WBPU060011752025

Filing Number

1170/2025

Filing Date

18-Oct-2025

Registration No

131/2025

Registration Date

18-Oct-2025

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

6-Jm II

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Withdrawn

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Heli Swarnakar

    Adv. Ashutosh Tudu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raycharan Swarnakar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Daliy OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate 1st Court, Raghunathpur allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the case against her son Raycharan Swarnakar, finding that the dispute was personal in nature and had been amicably settled between them. Misc Case No. 126 of 2025 was dismissed as withdrawn without liberty to file afresh, as no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm II

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    W.S and Show Cause

    Jm II

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    W.S and Show Cause

    Jm II

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    W.S and Show Cause

    Jm II

  7. 03-Dec-2025

    For appearance

    Jm II

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    For appearance

    Jm II

  9. 18-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 131/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate 1st Court, Raghunathpur allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the case against her son Raycharan Swarnakar, finding that the dispute was personal in nature and had been amicably settled between them. Misc Case No. 126 of 2025 was dismissed as withdrawn without liberty to file afresh, as no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case