State of West Bengal vs Nandalal Bauri — 721/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),3(5),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBPU060010892025
e-Filing Number
13-10-2025
Filing Number
1084/2025
Filing Date
13-10-2025
Registration No
721/2025
Registration Date
13-10-2025
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
5-ACJM II
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
PARA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. APP In charge
Respondent(s)
Nandalal Bauri
Sanjib Bauri
Adv. null
Koushik Bauri
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ACJM II
Disposed
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 30-10-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Nandalal Bauri & Others (Case 721/2025) The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused persons (Nandalal Bauri, Sanjib Bauri, and Koushik Bauri) of charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), and 3(5), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant claimed the accused assaulted him with a bamboo stick, abused him, and threatened him during a boundary wall dispute, the court found the evidence insufficient: only the complainant witness testified substantively but admitted inconsistencies (claimed going to police the same day but FIR was filed two days later), other witnesses provided no relevant testimony, the complainant's wife was not produced, and a pending counter-case created credibility concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Nandalal Bauri & Others (Case 721/2025) The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused persons (Nandalal Bauri, Sanjib Bauri, and Koushik Bauri) of charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), and 3(5), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant claimed the accused assaulted him with a bamboo stick, abused him, and threatened him during a boundary wall dispute, the court found the evidence insufficient: only the complainant witness testified substantively but admitted inconsistencies (claimed going to police the same day but FIR was filed two days later), other witnesses provided no relevant testimony, the complainant's wife was not produced, and a pending counter-case created credibility concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts