Ruksana Begam @ Janinisha Begam vs Sk. Sarafat — 67/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144(3). Status: Payment. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.

Payment Next hearing 31-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Misc. Execution Case

CNR: WBPU060007672024

Filing Number

766/2024

Filing Date

14-Aug-2024

Registration No

67/2024

Registration Date

14-Aug-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

2-Acjm, Raghunathpur

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ruksana Begam @ Janinisha Begam

    Adv. A.Dutta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sk. Sarafat

Case History

  1. 31-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Payment

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  3. 08-Dec-2025

    Payment

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  4. 07-Nov-2025

    Payment

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  5. 30-Oct-2025

    Payment

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  6. 29-Oct-2025

    Payment

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  7. 18-Oct-2025

    Payment

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  8. 24-Sep-2025

    Daliy Order

    Summary: The court rejected the Opposite Party's petition challenging the maintainability of the petitioner's execution petition filed under Section 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code for recovery of maintenance arrears totaling Rs. 2,32,000 for the period from August 30, 2011 to July 30, 2024. The court held that Section 128 of Cr.P.C provides an unlimited enforcement mechanism without any statutory limitation period, unlike Section 125(3) which restricts recovery to one year, thereby allowing the petitioner to recover arrears even beyond the one-year limitation period. The petitioner is now at liberty to proceed with her maintenance recovery petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Payment

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    Restored

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  11. 24-Sep-2025

    Disposed

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  12. 12-Sep-2025

    Order

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  13. 13-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  14. 29-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  16. 16-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  18. 23-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  19. 21-May-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  20. 29-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  21. 05-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  22. 17-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  23. 27-Dec-2024

    For S/R and appearence

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  24. 06-Nov-2024

    For S/R and appearence

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  25. 24-Oct-2024

    For S/R and appearence

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  26. 26-Sep-2024

    For S/R and appearence

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  27. 30-Aug-2024

    For S/R and appearence

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  28. 22-Aug-2024

    Put Up

  29. 14-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 14-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the Opposite Party's petition challenging the maintainability of the petitioner's execution petition filed under Section 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code for recovery of maintenance arrears totaling Rs. 2,32,000 for the period from August 30, 2011 to July 30, 2024. The court held that Section 128 of Cr.P.C provides an unlimited enforcement mechanism without any statutory limitation period, unlike Section 125(3) which restricts recovery to one year, thereby allowing the petitioner to recover arrears even beyond the one-year limitation period. The petitioner is now at liberty to proceed with her maintenance recovery petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case