Sunita Kumari vs Arun Kumar — 80/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316. Status: Awaiting Order from Upper Court. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
Complaint Case
CNR: WBPU060007342024
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
733/2024
Filing Date
07-08-2024
Registration No
80/2024
Registration Date
07-08-2024
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
4-JM I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunita Kumari
Adv. P. Chowdhury
Respondent(s)
Arun Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JM I
Awaiting Order from Upper Court
Evidence before charge
Evidence before charge
Evidence before charge
Evidence before charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Order from Upper Court | |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence before charge | |
| 20-12-2025 | Evidence before charge | |
| 20-11-2025 | Evidence before charge | |
| 14-10-2025 | Evidence before charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition for a search warrant under Section 94 CrPC filed by Smt. Sunita Kumari to recover alleged stridhan articles from her husband's house has been rejected. The court found insufficient documentary evidence, credible material, and proper identification of the articles to satisfy the legal requirement of "reason to believe" that stolen or illegally retained property exists at the specified location. The complainant is permitted to adduce evidence during inquiry or trial and may renew the prayer at an appropriate stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition for a search warrant under Section 94 CrPC filed by Smt. Sunita Kumari to recover alleged stridhan articles from her husband's house has been rejected. The court found insufficient documentary evidence, credible material, and proper identification of the articles to satisfy the legal requirement of "reason to believe" that stolen or illegally retained property exists at the specified location. The complainant is permitted to adduce evidence during inquiry or trial and may renew the prayer at an appropriate stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts