Mohammad Jalaluddin vs Shakila Khatoon — 73/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 127. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed Exparty on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Case

CNR: WBPU060005822025

Filing Number

579/2025

Filing Date

19-Jun-2025

Registration No

73/2025

Registration Date

19-Jun-2025

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

4-Jm I

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed Exparty

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 127

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammad Jalaluddin

    Adv. Ravi Bhusan Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shakila Khatoon

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. to modify a 2015 maintenance order requiring him to pay Rs. 5,000 monthly to his wife. The court found that the parties had executed a written settlement agreement on March 7, 2017, whereby the petitioner paid a lump sum of Rs. 3,00,000 as full and final maintenance, and the opposite party agreed not to claim further maintenance. Since this constituted a material change in circumstances and the opposite party accepted the settlement amount, the court set aside the earlier maintenance order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jm I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Jm I

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Jm I

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Jm I

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    For appearance

    Jm I

  9. 22-Sep-2025

    For appearance

    Jm I

  10. 07-Aug-2025

    For appearance

    Jm I

  11. 27-Jun-2025

    For appearance

    Jm I

  12. 19-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 19-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 73/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. to modify a 2015 maintenance order requiring him to pay Rs. 5,000 monthly to his wife. The court found that the parties had executed a written settlement agreement on March 7, 2017, whereby the petitioner paid a lump sum of Rs. 3,00,000 as full and final maintenance, and the opposite party agreed not to claim further maintenance. Since this constituted a material change in circumstances and the opposite party accepted the settlement amount, the court set aside the earlier maintenance order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case