Mohammad Jalaluddin vs Shakila Khatoon — 73/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 127. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed Exparty on 13th April 2026.
Misc. Case
CNR: WBPU060005822025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
579/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
73/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
4-JM I
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed Exparty
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammad Jalaluddin
Adv. Ravi Bhusan Sharma
Respondent(s)
Shakila Khatoon
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JM I
Disposed
Exparte Hearing
Exparte Hearing
Exparte Hearing
For appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Exparte Hearing | |
| 11-02-2026 | Exparte Hearing | |
| 07-01-2026 | Exparte Hearing | |
| 14-11-2025 | For appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. to modify a 2015 maintenance order requiring him to pay Rs. 5,000 monthly to his wife. The court found that the parties had executed a written settlement agreement on March 7, 2017, whereby the petitioner paid a lump sum of Rs. 3,00,000 as full and final maintenance, and the opposite party agreed not to claim further maintenance. Since this constituted a material change in circumstances and the opposite party accepted the settlement amount, the court set aside the earlier maintenance order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. to modify a 2015 maintenance order requiring him to pay Rs. 5,000 monthly to his wife. The court found that the parties had executed a written settlement agreement on March 7, 2017, whereby the petitioner paid a lump sum of Rs. 3,00,000 as full and final maintenance, and the opposite party agreed not to claim further maintenance. Since this constituted a material change in circumstances and the opposite party accepted the settlement amount, the court set aside the earlier maintenance order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts