State of West Bengal vs Amilal Hansda — 375/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 341,323,354,506,IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBPU060005482023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

548/2023

Filing Date

06-06-2023

Registration No

375/2023

Registration Date

06-06-2023

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

4-JM I

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 341,323,354,506,IPC

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. Parimal Choudhury

Respondent(s)

Amilal Hansda

Hearing History

Judge: 4-JM I

10-03-2026

Disposed

12-02-2026

E/R of W/A

23-12-2025

E/R of W/A

24-10-2025

E/R of W/A

20-08-2025

E/R of W/A

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Daliy Order
10-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Heno Hansda of charges under IPC sections 341/323/354/506 (wrongful restraint, assault, outraging modesty, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony lacked independent corroboration—key witnesses admitted they didn't witness the incident, no medical evidence was produced despite claims of hospital treatment, and no independent witnesses were examined despite the complainant's admission that several persons were present at the occurrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

21-06-2024
Daliy Order
12-02-2026
Daliy Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Heno Hansda of charges under IPC sections 341/323/354/506 (wrongful restraint, assault, outraging modesty, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony lacked independent corroboration—key witnesses admitted they didn't witness the incident, no medical evidence was produced despite claims of hospital treatment, and no independent witnesses were examined despite the complainant's admission that several persons were present at the occurrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case