State of West Bengal vs Amilal Hansda — 375/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 341,323,354,506,IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBPU060005482023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
548/2023
Filing Date
06-06-2023
Registration No
375/2023
Registration Date
06-06-2023
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
4-JM I
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. Parimal Choudhury
Respondent(s)
Amilal Hansda
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JM I
Disposed
E/R of W/A
E/R of W/A
E/R of W/A
E/R of W/A
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-02-2026 | E/R of W/A | |
| 23-12-2025 | E/R of W/A | |
| 24-10-2025 | E/R of W/A | |
| 20-08-2025 | E/R of W/A |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Heno Hansda of charges under IPC sections 341/323/354/506 (wrongful restraint, assault, outraging modesty, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony lacked independent corroboration—key witnesses admitted they didn't witness the incident, no medical evidence was produced despite claims of hospital treatment, and no independent witnesses were examined despite the complainant's admission that several persons were present at the occurrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Heno Hansda of charges under IPC sections 341/323/354/506 (wrongful restraint, assault, outraging modesty, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony lacked independent corroboration—key witnesses admitted they didn't witness the incident, no medical evidence was produced despite claims of hospital treatment, and no independent witnesses were examined despite the complainant's admission that several persons were present at the occurrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts