State of West Bengal vs Dinanath Mondal — 354/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,414. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBPU060005072022

Filing Number

507/2022

Filing Date

14-Jun-2022

Registration No

354/2022

Registration Date

14-Jun-2022

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

5-Acjm II

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

SANTURI

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,414
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation ) Act Section 21(1)(4)
Motor Vehicles Act Section 181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dinanath Mondal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Dinanath Mondal (354/2022) The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted Dinanath Mondal of charges under IPC sections 379/411/414, WB Mines and Minerals Act 1957 section 21(1)(4), and Motor Vehicles Act section 181, finding the prosecution's case riddled with loopholes. The court found critical deficiencies: the only private witness disavowed knowledge, two police witnesses couldn't recall the tractor number despite claiming presence, the complainant failed to identify the accused or provide the victim's name, no sand samples were tested, and notably absent were independent witnesses from the populated village during evening hours. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm II

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Acjm II

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Acjm II

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm II

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm II

  11. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm II

  12. 13-May-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  13. 19-Feb-2025

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  14. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  15. 25-Nov-2024

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  16. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  17. 21-Aug-2024

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  18. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  19. 20-Jun-2024

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  20. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  21. 19-Mar-2024

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  22. 19-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  23. 03-Jan-2024

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  24. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  25. 09-Nov-2023

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  26. 09-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  27. 13-Sep-2023

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  28. 13-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  29. 26-Jul-2023

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  30. 26-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  31. 31-May-2023

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  32. 31-May-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  33. 17-Mar-2023

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  34. 17-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  35. 09-Jan-2023

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  36. 09-Jan-2023

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  37. 22-Nov-2022

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  38. 22-Nov-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  39. 30-Aug-2022

    For appearance

    Acjm, 2Nd Court, Raghunathpur

  40. 28-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 14-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 354/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Dinanath Mondal (354/2022) The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted Dinanath Mondal of charges under IPC sections 379/411/414, WB Mines and Minerals Act 1957 section 21(1)(4), and Motor Vehicles Act section 181, finding the prosecution's case riddled with loopholes. The court found critical deficiencies: the only private witness disavowed knowledge, two police witnesses couldn't recall the tractor number despite claiming presence, the complainant failed to identify the accused or provide the victim's name, no sand samples were tested, and notably absent were independent witnesses from the populated village during evening hours. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case