State of West Bengal vs Rajesh Bauri — 308/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),3(5),324(4),329(4),74. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBPU060004972025
e-Filing Number
19-05-2025
Filing Number
494/2025
Filing Date
19-May-2025
Registration No
308/2025
Registration Date
19-May-2025
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
5-Acjm II
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
159
Police Station
PARA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Adv. APP In charge
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajesh Bauri
-
2.Chayan Bauri
-
3.Joydeb Bauri
-
4.Shyamapada Bauri
-
5.Basanta Bauri
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused persons (Rajesh Bauri, Chayan Bauri, Joydeb Bauri, Shyamapada Bauri, and Basanta Bauri) of charges under BNS sections 329(4)/115(2)/74/324(4)/3(5). The court found the prosecution's evidence unreliable due to major contradictions: the main witness deviated significantly from her written complaint, other witnesses provided conflicting accounts, and no medical evidence corroborated the alleged assault or property damage, resulting in reasonable doubt about guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm II
-
07-Mar-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Acjm II
-
30-Dec-2025
Evidence
Acjm II
-
07-Nov-2025
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Acjm II
-
30-Aug-2025
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
30-Aug-2025
For appearance
Acjm II
-
02-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 308/2025
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused persons (Rajesh Bauri, Chayan Bauri, Joydeb Bauri, Shyamapada Bauri, and Basanta Bauri) of charges under BNS sections 329(4)/115(2)/74/324(4)/3(5). The court found the prosecution's evidence unreliable due to major contradictions: the main witness deviated significantly from her written complaint, other witnesses provided conflicting accounts, and no medical evidence corroborated the alleged assault or property damage, resulting in reasonable doubt about guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts