State of West Bengal vs Pampa Modak — 212/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,325,34,354-B,448,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBPU060002972025
e-Filing Number
12-03-2025
Filing Number
297/2025
Filing Date
12-Mar-2025
Registration No
212/2025
Registration Date
12-Mar-2025
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
5-Acjm II
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
107
Police Station
PARA
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Adv. APP In charge
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pampa Modak
-
2.Subadh Modak
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Pampa Modak & Subodh Modak (Case 212/2025) The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted both accused of charges under IPC sections 448/323/354B/506/34 (house trespass, assault, outraging modesty, criminal intimidation). The prosecution's two witnesses—the complainant and her husband—failed to support the case, testifying only to a family dispute without corroborating the alleged assault with a lathi, saree-pulling, or threats. Finding no credible evidence beyond reasonable doubt, the court discharged the accused from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm II
-
13-Mar-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Acjm II
-
11-Feb-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Acjm II
-
19-Dec-2025
For appearance
Acjm II
-
14-Oct-2025
For appearance
Acjm II
-
05-Aug-2025
For appearance
Acjm II
-
25-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 212/2025
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Pampa Modak & Subodh Modak (Case 212/2025) The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted both accused of charges under IPC sections 448/323/354B/506/34 (house trespass, assault, outraging modesty, criminal intimidation). The prosecution's two witnesses—the complainant and her husband—failed to support the case, testifying only to a family dispute without corroborating the alleged assault with a lathi, saree-pulling, or threats. Finding no credible evidence beyond reasonable doubt, the court discharged the accused from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts