State of West Bengal vs Hemanta Hela 3 ors. Advocate - R.N.Mishra — 1155/2014
Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBPU060002492010
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1534/2014
Filing Date
18-10-2010
Registration No
1155/2014
Registration Date
18-10-2010
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
4-JM I
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
SANTALDIH
Year
2010
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. A.P.P. In Charge
Respondent(s)
Hemanta Hela 3 ors. Advocate - R.N.Mishra
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JM I
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Charge / Plea Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-11-2025 | Charge / Plea Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Hemanta Hela of charges under Section 392 IPC (robbery) and Arms Act Sections 25/27/35, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) stated he remembered nothing about the incident and provided no substantive evidence regarding the alleged robbery, use of arms, or involvement of the accused. The court emphasized that without reliable witness testimony, the unproven alleged motorcycle recovery, and the absent Investigating Officer, the prosecution's case collapsed entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Hemanta Hela of charges under Section 392 IPC (robbery) and Arms Act Sections 25/27/35, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) stated he remembered nothing about the incident and provided no substantive evidence regarding the alleged robbery, use of arms, or involvement of the accused. The court emphasized that without reliable witness testimony, the unproven alleged motorcycle recovery, and the absent Investigating Officer, the prosecution's case collapsed entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts