State of West Bengal vs Pandabeswar Bauri — 169/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),117(2),3,3(5),329(3),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBPU060002342025
e-Filing Number
25-02-2025
Filing Number
234/2025
Filing Date
25-Feb-2025
Registration No
169/2025
Registration Date
25-Feb-2025
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
4-Jm I
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Adv. APP In charge
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pandabeswar Bauri
-
2.Madan Bauri
Adv. null
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Madan Bauri and Pandabeswar Bauri of assault charges under BNS sections 329(3)/115(2)/117(2)/351(2)(3)/3(5) because the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Both key witnesses—the informant and the victim—turned hostile, disowned the FIR allegations, and refused to support the prosecution, leaving no reliable evidence to establish the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm I
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence and 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm I
-
28-Jan-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jm I
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
30-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
08-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
02-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
26-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
29-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
09-Apr-2025
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
10-Mar-2025
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 169/2025
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Madan Bauri and Pandabeswar Bauri of assault charges under BNS sections 329(3)/115(2)/117(2)/351(2)(3)/3(5) because the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Both key witnesses—the informant and the victim—turned hostile, disowned the FIR allegations, and refused to support the prosecution, leaving no reliable evidence to establish the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts