State of West Bengal vs Md Jamal Advocate - R.N.Mishra — 1381/2014
Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBPU060001892008
Filing Number
1822/2014
Filing Date
04-Oct-2008
Registration No
1381/2014
Registration Date
04-Oct-2008
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia
Judge
4-Jm I
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
KASHIPUR
Year
2008
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Adv. A.P.P. In Charge
Respondent(s)
-
1.Md Jamal Advocate - R.N.Mishra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted Md. Jamal of charges under Sections 25(1)(a)/27 of the Arms Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical evidentiary gaps: lack of independent witnesses at the seizure, the key witness's failure to identify the accused or seized articles, absence of identifying marks on the firearm, and absence of a clear chain of custody. The cumulative effect of these deficiencies created reasonable doubt regarding the accused's conscious possession of the firearm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jm I
-
10-Mar-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Report
Jm I
-
23-Feb-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Report
Jm I
-
06-Feb-2026
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Report
Jm I
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
04-Nov-2025
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
07-May-2025
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
07-May-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
26-Mar-2025
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
24-Feb-2025
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
10-Feb-2025
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
07-Feb-2025
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
22-Jan-2025
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
07-Nov-2024
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
11-Sep-2024
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
20-Jul-2024
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
07-Jun-2024
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
07-Jun-2024
Evidence
Jm I
-
02-May-2024
Evidence
Jm I
-
12-Feb-2024
Evidence
Jm I
-
02-Dec-2023
Evidence
Jm I
-
30-Nov-2023
Evidence
Jm I
-
16-Sep-2023
Evidence
Jm I
-
17-Jul-2023
Evidence
Jm I
-
10-May-2023
Evidence
Jm I
-
28-Feb-2023
Evidence
Jm I
-
26-Dec-2022
Evidence
Jm I
-
10-Nov-2022
Evidence
Jm I
-
31-Aug-2022
Evidence
Jm I
-
18-Jul-2022
Evidence
Jm I
-
06-Jun-2022
Evidence
Jm I
-
08-Apr-2022
Evidence
Jm I
-
15-Feb-2022
Evidence
Jm I
-
03-Jan-2022
Evidence
Jm I
-
17-Dec-2021
Evidence
Jm I
-
11-Nov-2021
Put Up
Jm I
-
01-Sep-2021
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
07-Jul-2021
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
20-Jan-2021
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
04-Nov-2020
E/R of W/A
-
28-Aug-2020
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
08-Jul-2020
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
16-Apr-2020
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
06-Feb-2020
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
29-Nov-2019
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
30-Sep-2019
E/R of W/A
Jm I
-
23-May-2019
For appearance
Jm I
-
03-Jan-2019
E/R of W/A
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
26-Jul-2018
E/R of W/A
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
06-Jun-2018
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
02-Apr-2018
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
02-Feb-2018
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
15-Nov-2017
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
24-Jul-2017
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
19-Apr-2017
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
20-Jan-2017
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
20-Jan-2017
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
06-Dec-2016
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
06-Dec-2016
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
03-Sep-2016
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
20-Jul-2016
Daliy OrderView PDF
-
20-Jul-2016
Evidence
Acjm, Raghunathpur
-
29-Jul-2015
Evidence
Jm
-
09-Jun-2015
Evidence
Jm
-
23-Apr-2015
Evidence
Jm
-
08-Apr-2015
Evidence
Jm
-
02-Jan-2015
Evidence
Jm
-
26-Nov-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Oct-2008
Case filed
Registration No. 1381/2014
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted Md. Jamal of charges under Sections 25(1)(a)/27 of the Arms Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical evidentiary gaps: lack of independent witnesses at the seizure, the key witness's failure to identify the accused or seized articles, absence of identifying marks on the firearm, and absence of a clear chain of custody. The cumulative effect of these deficiencies created reasonable doubt regarding the accused's conscious possession of the firearm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts