State of West Bengal vs Gautam Bhuia another Advocate - Sunil Baran Das — 626/2014

Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBPU060001122010

Filing Number

854/2014

Filing Date

04-Apr-2010

Registration No

626/2014

Registration Date

04-Apr-2010

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

4-Jm I

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. A.P.P. In Charge

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gautam Bhuia another Advocate - Sunil Baran Das

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Balbir Singh (@Pintu Singh) of charges under IPC Section 414 (receiving stolen property). The court found the prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients of the offense, as no competent witness established the coal's ownership or stolen nature, the sole prosecution witness had no recollection of the case, no investigating officer testified, and no documentary or scientific evidence corroborated the theft claim. Applying the principle that suspicion cannot replace proof, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm I

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence and 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm I

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  11. 20-Sep-2025

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  13. 03-Jul-2025

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  14. 03-Jul-2025

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  15. 25-Apr-2025

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  16. 25-Apr-2025

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  17. 13-Mar-2025

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  18. 24-Dec-2024

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  19. 24-Dec-2024

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  20. 02-Dec-2024

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  21. 02-Dec-2024

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  22. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Jm I

  23. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jm I

  24. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jm I

  25. 13-May-2024

    Evidence

    Jm I

  26. 29-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Jm I

  27. 08-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Jm I

  28. 04-Dec-2023

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  29. 04-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jm I

  30. 28-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Jm I

  31. 17-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Jm I

  32. 12-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Jm I

  33. 22-Mar-2023

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  34. 09-Jan-2023

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  35. 22-Nov-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  36. 15-Sep-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  37. 11-Aug-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  38. 14-Jul-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  39. 08-Jun-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  40. 12-Apr-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  41. 16-Feb-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  42. 03-Jan-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  43. 28-Oct-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  44. 08-Oct-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  45. 04-Sep-2021

    Put Up

    Jm I

  46. 17-Jul-2021

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  47. 28-May-2021

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  48. 07-May-2021

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  49. 19-Dec-2020

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  50. 20-Oct-2020

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

  51. 25-Aug-2020

    E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  52. 02-Jul-2020

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  53. 06-Apr-2020

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  54. 27-Jan-2020

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  55. 03-Jan-2020

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  56. 05-Nov-2019

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  57. 17-Sep-2019

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  58. 26-Jul-2019

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Jm I

  59. 25-Jun-2019

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  60. 22-May-2019

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  61. 25-Mar-2019

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm I

  62. 01-Nov-2018

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  63. 13-Jun-2018

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  64. 20-Jan-2018

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  65. 21-Aug-2017

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  66. 12-Apr-2017

    For appearance and E/R of W/A

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  67. 14-Dec-2016

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  68. 08-Sep-2016

    E/R of W/A

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  69. 03-May-2016

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  70. 03-May-2016

    E/R of W/A

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  71. 05-Jan-2016

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  72. 05-Jan-2016

    E/R of W/A

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  73. 26-Aug-2015

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  74. 26-Aug-2015

    Filing copy of Pleadings/document with cost

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  75. 12-May-2015

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  76. 12-May-2015

    E/R of W/A

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  77. 22-Jan-2015

    E/R of W/A

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  78. 02-Jan-2015

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm, Raghunathpur

  79. 08-Aug-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  80. 04-Apr-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 626/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Balbir Singh (@Pintu Singh) of charges under IPC Section 414 (receiving stolen property). The court found the prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients of the offense, as no competent witness established the coal's ownership or stolen nature, the sole prosecution witness had no recollection of the case, no investigating officer testified, and no documentary or scientific evidence corroborated the theft claim. Applying the principle that suspicion cannot replace proof, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case