State of West Bengal vs Bhurka @ Rajesh Singh another Advocate - A.Tudu — 451/2014

Disposed: Uncontested--File for Present on 06th March 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBPU060000642010

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

547/2014

Filing Date

09-10-2010

Registration No

451/2014

Registration Date

09-10-2010

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

4-JM I

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--File for Present

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. A.P.P. In- Charge

Respondent(s)

Bhurka @ Rajesh Singh another Advocate - A.Tudu

Hearing History

Judge: 4-JM I

06-03-2026

Disposed

19-01-2026

For appearance and E/R of W/A

19-12-2025

For appearance and E/R of W/A

15-11-2025

For appearance and E/R of W/A

17-10-2025

For appearance and E/R of W/A

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Daliy Order

The Judicial Magistrate 1st Court, Raghunathpur declared accused SK Babua as a proclaimed person under Section 82(4) of CrPC 1973, after the accused absconded to avoid arrest warrant execution and deliberately delayed trial proceedings. A proclamation notice was issued on 19.01.2026 requiring the accused to appear within thirty days, and the court found sufficient grounds to believe the accused intentionally procrastinated to frustrate the criminal justice system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

08-04-2015
Daliy Order
03-07-2015
Daliy Order
11-08-2015
Daliy Order
03-10-2015
Daliy Order
29-12-2015
Daliy Order
17-06-2016
Daliy Order
18-09-2018
Daliy Order
18-09-2023
Daliy Order
02-07-2025
Daliy Order
26-09-2025
Daliy Order
19-01-2026
Daliy Order
casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate 1st Court, Raghunathpur declared accused SK Babua as a proclaimed person under Section 82(4) of CrPC 1973, after the accused absconded to avoid arrest warrant execution and deliberately delayed trial proceedings. A proclamation notice was issued on 19.01.2026 requiring the accused to appear within thirty days, and the court found sufficient grounds to believe the accused intentionally procrastinated to frustrate the criminal justice system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case