State of West Bengal vs Manesh @ Dilip Mukherjee 3 ors. Advocate - L.K.Moni — 471/2014

Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th April 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBPU060000202003

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

570/2014

Filing Date

04-03-2003

Registration No

471/2014

Registration Date

04-03-2003

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

6-JM II

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

RAGHUNATHPUR

Year

2003

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. A.P.P. In- Charge

Respondent(s)

Manesh @ Dilip Mukherjee 3 ors. Advocate - L.K.Moni

Hearing History

Judge: 6-JM II

20-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Charge / Plea Hearing

10-03-2026

Charge / Plea Hearing

11-02-2026

Charge / Plea Hearing

27-01-2026

Charge / Plea Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Judgement
20-04-2026
Daliy Order

The Judicial Magistrate 2nd Court, Raghunathpur acquitted accused Rajesh Supakar (@Bablu) of the offense under Section 394 IPC (dacoity), finding him "Not Guilty" due to lack of incriminating evidence. The court dispensed with the accused's examination under Section 313 CrPC and discharged the surety from the bail bond, while allowing the complainant to pursue remedies under Section 372 CrPC with free legal assistance if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

28-04-2015
Daliy Order
11-08-2015
Daliy Order
23-12-2015
Daliy Order
10-05-2016
Daliy Order
13-02-2017
Daliy Order
05-05-2025
Daliy Order
09-06-2025
Daliy Order
29-07-2025
Daliy Order
24-10-2025
Daliy Order
24-12-2025
Daliy Order
11-02-2026
Daliy Order
07-04-2026
Daliy Order
casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate 2nd Court, Raghunathpur acquitted accused Rajesh Supakar (@Bablu) of the offense under Section 394 IPC (dacoity), finding him "Not Guilty" due to lack of incriminating evidence. The court dispensed with the accused's examination under Section 313 CrPC and discharged the surety from the bail bond, while allowing the complainant to pursue remedies under Section 372 CrPC with free legal assistance if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raghunathpur, Purulia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case