State of West Bengal vs Rajib kumr Thakur alias Rajib Kumar. — 9/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 379,399. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBPU050000982026

Filing Number

67/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Raghunathpur, Purulia

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 379,399

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajib kumr Thakur alias Rajib Kumar.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the State's criminal revision petition, affirming the lower court's orders. The court held that the remand period under Section 167 CrPC must be calculated from the date of shown arrest (27.01.2026), and since the statutory custody period had expired by the time police remand was requested, the Magistrate correctly rejected the remand application. The court found the Investigating Officer was estopped from challenging the shown arrest procedure after having initiated and accepted it without objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Daliy OrderView PDF

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the State's criminal revision petition, affirming the lower court's orders. The court held that the remand period under Section 167 CrPC must be calculated from the date of shown arrest (27.01.2026), and since the statutory custody period had expired by the time police remand was requested, the Magistrate correctly rejected the remand application. The court found the Investigating Officer was estopped from challenging the shown arrest procedure after having initiated and accepted it without objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case