State of West Bengal vs Subham Mahato — 36/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,126(2),117(2),118(2),351(2),3(5). Status: Production. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
SC Spl case - Sessions Case Spl
CNR: WBPU010025002025
e-Filing Number
18-09-2025
Filing Number
2061/2025
Filing Date
18-Sep-2025
Registration No
36/2025
Registration Date
18-Sep-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Purulia
Judge
2-ADJ I
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Adv. Ld Spl PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Subham Mahato
-
2.Sukantala Mahato alias Shakuntala
Adv. null
-
3.Sahachari Mahato alias Sanchari Mahato
Adv. null
-
4.Subir Chandra Mahato@Pintu mahato
Adv. null
-
5.Giridhari Mahato
Adv. null
-
6.Bulti Mahato alias Santoshi Mahato
Adv. null
-
7.Pasupati Mahato alias Pashuya
Adv. null
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Production
ADJ I
-
29-Jan-2026
Production
ADJ I
-
23-Dec-2025
Daily OrderView PDF
Case Adjourned In S.C. Special Case No. 36 of 2025, the Addl. Sessions Judge, Purulia adjourned the case to 29-01-2026 for production of three accused persons (Subham Mahato, Giridhari Mahato, and Pashupati Mahato) who could not be produced due to unavailability of police escort and vehicle. The accused persons are remanded to judicial custody till the next date, and no adverse order was passed following a Local Bar Association resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing
ADJ I
-
21-Nov-2025
Daily OrderView PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
Hearing
ADJ I
-
24-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2025
Case Adjourned In S.C. Special Case No. 36 of 2025, the Addl. Sessions Judge, Purulia adjourned the case to 29-01-2026 for production of three accused persons (Subham Mahato, Giridhari Mahato, and Pashupati Mahato) who could not be produced due to unavailability of police escort and vehicle. The accused persons are remanded to judicial custody till the next date, and no adverse order was passed following a Local Bar Association resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts