Bholanath Gorain and ( vs Baneswar Kumar Mahato — 6/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 174. Status: SR/AD/Appearence. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

M A C C Ex. - MACC Execution

CNR: WBPU010017002024

SR/AD/Appearence

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

Filing Number

341/2024

Filing Date

20-07-2024

Registration No

6/2024

Registration Date

20-07-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Purulia

Judge

1-District Judge

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 174

Petitioner(s)

Bholanath Gorain and (

Ors

Adv. Dr. Rahul Singhania

Respondent(s)

Baneswar Kumar Mahato

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

06-03-2026

SR/AD/Appearence

05-02-2026

SR/AD/Appearence

05-01-2026

SR/AD/Appearence

20-11-2025

SR/AD/Appearence

29-10-2025

SR/AD/Appearence

Interim Orders

24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
24-06-2025
Daily Order
22-07-2025
Daily Order
20-08-2025
Daily Order
23-09-2025
Daily Order
29-10-2025
Daily Order
20-11-2025
Daily Order
05-01-2026
Daily Order
05-02-2026
Daily Order
06-03-2026
Daily Order

Summary (Order No. 19, dated 06.03.2026): The case was adjourned as no Statement of Reply (SR) was received from the Opposite Party. The Petitioner appeared through counsel, but the Regular P.O. was unavailable due to involvement in SIR proceedings as per Supreme Court directions. The matter is rescheduled for 08.04.2026 for SR and appearance of OP. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary (Order No. 19, dated 06.03.2026): The case was adjourned as no Statement of Reply (SR) was received from the Opposite Party. The Petitioner appeared through counsel, but the Regular P.O. was unavailable due to involvement in SIR proceedings as per Supreme Court directions. The matter is rescheduled for 08.04.2026 for SR and appearance of OP. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Purulia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case