Uma Laha vs national Insurance company Ltd. — 68/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 163A. Status: Argument / Further Argument. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
M A C C - M.A.C.C
CNR: WBPU010011222019
Filing Number
259/2019
Filing Date
09-Jul-2019
Registration No
68/2019
Registration Date
10-Jul-2019
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Purulia
Judge
1-District Judge
Last updated 22-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Uma Laha
Adv. Gangadhar Mahato
Respondent(s)
-
1.national Insurance company Ltd.
Case History
-
22-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Daily OrderView PDF
Summary: In MAC Case No. 68 of 2019, the MACT Purulia adjourned the case on 09.03.2026 due to the Local Bar Association resolution and unavailability of the Regular P.O. engaged in Supreme Court-directed SIR proceedings. The next hearing for further argument is fixed for 22.04.2026, with both parties required to file separate haziras. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument / Further Argument
District Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Daily OrderView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Argument / Further Argument
District Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Argument / Further Argument
District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Daily OrderView PDF
-
15-Dec-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Daily OrderView PDF
-
13-Nov-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District Judge
-
01-Sep-2025
Daily OrderView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Daily OrderView PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Daily OrderView PDF
-
09-Jun-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Mar-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2025
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
Argument / Further Argument
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jun-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-May-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
Daily OrderView PDF
-
22-Mar-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Feb-2024
Daily OrderView PDF
-
08-Feb-2024
Issues
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
Daily OrderView PDF
-
21-Dec-2023
Amended Plaint
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2023
Daily OrderView PDF
-
09-Oct-2023
DC Fees
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Aug-2023
Daily OrderView PDF
-
24-Aug-2023
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jul-2023
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2023
Hearing
District Judge
-
04-Apr-2023
Daily OrderView PDF
-
04-Apr-2023
Hearing
District Judge
-
30-Mar-2023
DC Fees
District Judge
-
23-Feb-2023
DC Fees
District Judge
-
19-Dec-2022
DC Fees
District Judge
-
20-Sep-2022
DC Fees
District Judge
-
22-Jun-2022
DC Fees
District Judge
-
29-Apr-2022
DC Fees
District Judge
-
03-Feb-2022
DC Fees
District Judge
-
02-Sep-2021
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
18-May-2021
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
16-Dec-2020
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
08-Jun-2020
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2020
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
24-Dec-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
24-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jul-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 68/2019
Summary: In MAC Case No. 68 of 2019, the MACT Purulia adjourned the case on 09.03.2026 due to the Local Bar Association resolution and unavailability of the Regular P.O. engaged in Supreme Court-directed SIR proceedings. The next hearing for further argument is fixed for 22.04.2026, with both parties required to file separate haziras. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts