Sk Hasimuddin vs State of West Bengal Advocate - Biswarup Pattanaik As Ld PP — 237/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Bail
CNR: WBPU010005482026
Filing Number
449/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
237/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Purulia
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
PURULIA MUFFASIL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sk Hasimuddin
Adv. Sk Mujibar Rahaman
Sk Sahid
Sk Tohid
Sk Ahid
Sk Kalimuddin
Sk Khalil
Sk Atikul
Sk Abir
Sk Sabir
Respondent(s)
State of West Bengal Advocate - Biswarup Pattanaik As Ld PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 237/2026 The Sessions Judge, Purulia partially granted anticipatory bail in this criminal case. Bail was rejected for five accused (Sk. Hasimuddin, Sk. Tohid, Sk. Khalil, Sk. Atikul, Sk. Abir) due to specific allegations against them under BNS sections 329(4)/115(2)/117(2)/118(1)/118(2)/109/3(5). However, bail was allowed for four others (Sk. Sahid, Sk. Ahid, Sk. Kalimuddin, Sk. Sabir) as no specific allegations existed and custodial interrogation was unnecessary, releasing them on Rs. 2,000 bond with surety each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 237/2026 The Sessions Judge, Purulia partially granted anticipatory bail in this criminal case. Bail was rejected for five accused (Sk. Hasimuddin, Sk. Tohid, Sk. Khalil, Sk. Atikul, Sk. Abir) due to specific allegations against them under BNS sections 329(4)/115(2)/117(2)/118(1)/118(2)/109/3(5). However, bail was allowed for four others (Sk. Sahid, Sk. Ahid, Sk. Kalimuddin, Sk. Sabir) as no specific allegations existed and custodial interrogation was unnecessary, releasing them on Rs. 2,000 bond with surety each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts