Gurupada Mandal vs State of West Bengal Advocate - Biswarup Pattanaik As Ld PP — 227/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBPU010005372026

Filing Number

438/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

227/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Purulia

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

MANBAZAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gurupada Mandal

    Adv. Tapas Kumar Patra

  2. 2.Rahul Mandal

  3. 3.Samir Mandal alias Samir Kumar Mandal

  4. 4.Sudarshan Mandal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal Advocate - Biswarup Pattanaik As Ld PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Purulia rejected anticipatory bail for Gurupada Mandal due to serious allegations of assault with a sharp cutting weapon, but granted anticipatory bail to Rahul Mandal, Samir Mandal, and Sudarshan Mandal, finding no necessity for custodial interrogation. The latter three accused must furnish bonds of Rs. 3,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each upon arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 227/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Purulia rejected anticipatory bail for Gurupada Mandal due to serious allegations of assault with a sharp cutting weapon, but granted anticipatory bail to Rahul Mandal, Samir Mandal, and Sudarshan Mandal, finding no necessity for custodial interrogation. The latter three accused must furnish bonds of Rs. 3,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each upon arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case