Abdul Sattar vs State of West Bengal Advocate - Biswarup Pattanaik As Ld PP — 214/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBPU010004992026

Filing Number

408/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

214/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Purulia

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

JHALDA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Sattar

    Adv. Anadi Charan Chatterjee

  2. 2.Khaijan Mustafa

  3. 3.Gulapsa parveen

  4. 4.Abdul Aktar

  5. 5.Nasima Bibi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal Advocate - Biswarup Pattanaik As Ld PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge, Purulia granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Abdul Sattar, Khaijan Mustafa, Gulapsa Parveen, Abdul Aktar, and Nasiman Bibi) in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 85/89/115(2)/3(5) and DP Act Sections 3/4. The court found the allegations omnibus in nature and determined no custodial interrogation was necessary for investigation. Each accused must furnish a bond of Rs.4,000 with two sureties of Rs.2,000 each upon arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Daily OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge, Purulia granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Abdul Sattar, Khaijan Mustafa, Gulapsa Parveen, Abdul Aktar, and Nasiman Bibi) in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 85/89/115(2)/3(5) and DP Act Sections 3/4. The court found the allegations omnibus in nature and determined no custodial interrogation was necessary for investigation. Each accused must furnish a bond of Rs.4,000 with two sureties of Rs.2,000 each upon arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case