Sk Sanjarul vs State of West Bengal Advocate - Biswarup Pattanaik As Ld PP — 197/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBPU010004742026

Filing Number

387/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

197/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Purulia

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

61

Police Station

PURULIA MUFFASIL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sk Sanjarul

    Adv. Bhola Nath Sarkar

  2. 2.Sk Yasin

  3. 3.Sk Sanwar

  4. 4.Sk Ejahar

  5. 5.Sk Ejajul

  6. 6.Sk Alamgir

  7. 7.Sk Latif

  8. 8.Sk Ramjan

  9. 9.Sk Suleman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal Advocate - Biswarup Pattanaik As Ld PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Purulia granted anticipatory bail to nine accused persons in a case involving simple injuries, finding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary for investigation. Each accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to conditions prohibiting tampering with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 197/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Purulia granted anticipatory bail to nine accused persons in a case involving simple injuries, finding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary for investigation. Each accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to conditions prohibiting tampering with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case