Archa Kumar Banerjee vs Bani Saha — 162/2015

Case under All Section 6(4). Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed ex-parte. on 11th May 2026.

EJ - EJECTMENT SUITS

CNR: WBPS010004492015

Case disposed

Filing Number

511/2015

Filing Date

24-03-2015

Registration No

162/2015

Registration Date

24-03-2015

Court

Presidency Small Causes Court

Judge

3-3RD BENCH

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed ex-parte.

Acts & Sections

All Section 6(4)

Petitioner(s)

Archa Kumar Banerjee

Adv. Md. Nasiruddin, Taposi Chatterjee

Respondent(s)

Bani Saha

Parbati Saha

Tamasha Saha

Rajesh Saha

Hearing History

Judge: 3-3RD BENCH

11-05-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

Order

12-03-2026

Argument / Further Argument

18-02-2026

Argument / Further Argument

02-01-2026

Exparte hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-05-2026
Decreed Exparte

The court decreed the ejectment suit ex parte against defendants Bani Saha, Parbati Saha, and Tamasha Saha, finding they defaulted on rent payments since March 2012. While the plaintiff failed to prove "reasonable requirement" (lacking documentary evidence and property inspection), the unchallenged testimony establishing rent default was sufficient. The defendants were ordered to vacate within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

28-08-2017
order
18-12-2021
order
11-05-2022
order
16-08-2022
order
14-11-2022
order
09-02-2023
order
11-05-2023
order
24-07-2023
order
12-10-2023
order
24-01-2024
order
15-03-2024
order
08-08-2024
order
18-09-2024
order
10-12-2024
order
05-03-2025
order
16-05-2025
order
21-08-2025
order
18-11-2025
order
02-01-2026
order
18-02-2026
order
12-03-2026
order
21-04-2026
order
casestatus.in Summary

The court decreed the ejectment suit ex parte against defendants Bani Saha, Parbati Saha, and Tamasha Saha, finding they defaulted on rent payments since March 2012. While the plaintiff failed to prove "reasonable requirement" (lacking documentary evidence and property inspection), the unchallenged testimony establishing rent default was sufficient. The defendants were ordered to vacate within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Presidency Small Causes Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case