Shankari Sett and others vs Biplab Banerjee — 65/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R97. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.

MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: WBPS010003042018

Case disposed

Filing Number

314/2018

Filing Date

20-03-2018

Registration No

65/2018

Registration Date

23-03-2018

Court

Presidency Small Causes Court

Judge

3-3RD BENCH

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R97

Petitioner(s)

Shankari Sett and others

Adv. Alok Banerjee

Hironmoy Sett

Sudipta Sett

Respondent(s)

Biplab Banerjee

Hearing History

Judge: 3-3RD BENCH

06-03-2026

Disposed

17-12-2025

Hearing of Petition

19-09-2025

Hearing of Petition

12-08-2025

Hearing of Petition

20-05-2025

Hearing of Petition

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
order

The Calcutta Small Cause Court dismissed the instant case as non-maintainable, finding that the original ex parte decree (EJ 6762 of 2014) had already been set aside through prior proceedings where the defendant complied with the payment condition of Rs. 10,000 as directed. The court held that since the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC had been allowed and the case restored to its original file with the cost payment obligation fulfilled, there was no basis to continue the current proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

05-01-2022
order
17-03-2022
order
15-06-2022
order
18-07-2022
order
14-09-2022
order
23-11-2022
order
23-11-2022
order
03-01-2023
order
21-02-2023
order
18-04-2023
order
03-07-2023
order
26-07-2023
order
08-09-2023
order
20-11-2023
order
12-02-2024
order
27-03-2024
order
15-05-2024
order
29-07-2024
order
04-09-2024
order
17-12-2024
order
03-03-2025
order
20-05-2025
order
12-08-2025
order
19-09-2025
order
17-12-2025
order
casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta Small Cause Court dismissed the instant case as non-maintainable, finding that the original ex parte decree (EJ 6762 of 2014) had already been set aside through prior proceedings where the defendant complied with the payment condition of Rs. 10,000 as directed. The court held that since the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC had been allowed and the case restored to its original file with the cost payment obligation fulfilled, there was no basis to continue the current proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Presidency Small Causes Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case