Moni Manjusha Nandy vs Gregory Simpson and another — 41/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 340. Status: Further Order. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Further Order Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: WBPS010001532021

Filing Number

165/2021

Filing Date

12-Mar-2021

Registration No

41/2021

Registration Date

12-Mar-2021

Court

Presidency Small Causes Court

Judge

5-5Th Bench

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 340

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Moni Manjusha Nandy

    Adv. Radha Nath Nandy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gregory Simpson and another

  2. 2.Symond Simpson

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Further Order

    5Th Bench

  3. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing of Misc Case

    5Th Bench

  4. 29-Oct-2025

    Hearing of Misc Case

    5Th Bench

  5. 23-Jun-2025

    Hearing of Misc Case

    5Th Bench

  6. 02-Apr-2025

    Show Cause

    5Th Bench

  7. 26-Mar-2025

    Restored

    5Th Bench

  8. 26-Mar-2025

    Hearing of Misc Case

    5Th Bench

  9. 05-Sep-2024

    order

    Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's petition filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which sought to initiate perjury proceedings against the defendants for allegedly making false statements regarding property ownership and tenancy. The Court found no material evidence at the preliminary stage to conclude that the defendants made false affidavits, noting that substantive questions regarding the defendants' 50% title claim and the landlord-tenant relationship can only be determined after recording full evidence. Additionally, the Court allowed the plaintiff's prayer to retrieve original judgments from a 1961 High Court appeal on undertaking to refile them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 05-Sep-2024

    Disposed

    5Th Bench

  11. 17-Jul-2024

    order

  12. 17-Jul-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    5Th Bench

  13. 15-May-2024

    order

  14. 15-May-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    5Th Bench

  15. 22-Mar-2024

    order

  16. 22-Mar-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    5Th Bench

  17. 31-Jan-2024

    order

  18. 31-Jan-2024

    Hearing of Petition

    5Th Bench

  19. 22-Nov-2023

    order

  20. 22-Nov-2023

    Hearing of Petition

    5Th Bench

  21. 02-Sep-2023

    order

  22. 02-Sep-2023

    Hearing of Petition

    5Th Bench

  23. 20-May-2023

    order

  24. 20-May-2023

    Hearing of Petition

    5Th Bench

  25. 18-Mar-2023

    order

  26. 18-Mar-2023

    Hearing of Petition

    5Th Bench

  27. 21-Jan-2023

    Hearing of Petition

  28. 19-Nov-2022

    Hearing of Petition

  29. 03-Sep-2022

    Hearing of Petition

  30. 04-Aug-2022

    Hearing of Misc Case

  31. 09-Jun-2022

    Hearing of Misc Case

  32. 20-May-2022

    order

  33. 20-May-2022

    Filing

  34. 28-Mar-2022

    Hearing of Petition

  35. 31-Jan-2022

    Steps

    5Th Bench

  36. 21-Dec-2021

    Steps

    5Th Bench

  37. 03-Sep-2021

    Written Objection

    5Th Bench

  38. 30-Jun-2021

    Written Objection

    5Th Bench

  39. 19-Apr-2021

    Written Objection

    5Th Bench

  40. 12-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 12-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's petition filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which sought to initiate perjury proceedings against the defendants for allegedly making false statements regarding property ownership and tenancy. The Court found no material evidence at the preliminary stage to conclude that the defendants made false affidavits, noting that substantive questions regarding the defendants' 50% title claim and the landlord-tenant relationship can only be determined after recording full evidence. Additionally, the Court allowed the plaintiff's prayer to retrieve original judgments from a 1961 High Court appeal on undertaking to refile them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case