Moni Manjusha Nandy vs Gregory Simpson and another — 41/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 340. Status: Further Order. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: WBPS010001532021

Further Order

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

165/2021

Filing Date

12-03-2021

Registration No

41/2021

Registration Date

12-03-2021

Court

Presidency Small Causes Court

Judge

5-5TH BENCH

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 340

Petitioner(s)

Moni Manjusha Nandy

Adv. Radha Nath Nandy

Respondent(s)

Gregory Simpson and another

Symond Simpson

Hearing History

Judge: 5-5TH BENCH

06-03-2026

Further Order

09-01-2026

Hearing of Misc Case

29-10-2025

Hearing of Misc Case

23-06-2025

Hearing of Misc Case

02-04-2025

SHOW CAUSE

Interim Orders

20-05-2022
order
18-03-2023
order
20-05-2023
order
02-09-2023
order
22-11-2023
order
31-01-2024
order
22-03-2024
order
15-05-2024
order
17-07-2024
order
05-09-2024
order

Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's petition filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which sought to initiate perjury proceedings against the defendants for allegedly making false statements regarding property ownership and tenancy. The Court found no material evidence at the preliminary stage to conclude that the defendants made false affidavits, noting that substantive questions regarding the defendants' 50% title claim and the landlord-tenant relationship can only be determined after recording full evidence. Additionally, the Court allowed the plaintiff's prayer to retrieve original judgments from a 1961 High Court appeal on undertaking to refile them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's petition filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which sought to initiate perjury proceedings against the defendants for allegedly making false statements regarding property ownership and tenancy. The Court found no material evidence at the preliminary stage to conclude that the defendants made false affidavits, noting that substantive questions regarding the defendants' 50% title claim and the landlord-tenant relationship can only be determined after recording full evidence. Additionally, the Court allowed the plaintiff's prayer to retrieve original judgments from a 1961 High Court appeal on undertaking to refile them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Presidency Small Causes Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case