Moni Manjusha Nandy vs Gregory Simpson and another — 41/2021
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 340. Status: Further Order. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
MISCCASE - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: WBPS010001532021
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
165/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
41/2021
Registration Date
12-03-2021
Court
Presidency Small Causes Court
Judge
5-5TH BENCH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Moni Manjusha Nandy
Adv. Radha Nath Nandy
Respondent(s)
Gregory Simpson and another
Symond Simpson
Hearing History
Judge: 5-5TH BENCH
Further Order
Hearing of Misc Case
Hearing of Misc Case
Hearing of Misc Case
SHOW CAUSE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Further Order |
| 09-01-2026 | Hearing of Misc Case |
| 29-10-2025 | Hearing of Misc Case |
| 23-06-2025 | Hearing of Misc Case |
| 02-04-2025 | SHOW CAUSE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's petition filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which sought to initiate perjury proceedings against the defendants for allegedly making false statements regarding property ownership and tenancy. The Court found no material evidence at the preliminary stage to conclude that the defendants made false affidavits, noting that substantive questions regarding the defendants' 50% title claim and the landlord-tenant relationship can only be determined after recording full evidence. Additionally, the Court allowed the plaintiff's prayer to retrieve original judgments from a 1961 High Court appeal on undertaking to refile them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court dismissed the plaintiff's petition filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which sought to initiate perjury proceedings against the defendants for allegedly making false statements regarding property ownership and tenancy. The Court found no material evidence at the preliminary stage to conclude that the defendants made false affidavits, noting that substantive questions regarding the defendants' 50% title claim and the landlord-tenant relationship can only be determined after recording full evidence. Additionally, the Court allowed the plaintiff's prayer to retrieve original judgments from a 1961 High Court appeal on undertaking to refile them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts