Samik Kr. Kahali vs Howard Memorial EnglishSchool — 154/2010

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Title Suit

CNR: WBNP180017632010

Filing Number

154/2010

Filing Date

22-Apr-2010

Registration No

154/2010

Registration Date

22-Apr-2010

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Divn. Bidhannagar

Judge

10-Civil Judge Jr Div

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Samik Kr. Kahali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Howard Memorial EnglishSchool

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Contested JudgmentView PDF

    The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit against Howard Memorial English School, finding that the school made proper attempts to serve the suspension and termination notices through registered post and personal delivery, and that the plaintiff intentionally avoided accepting them. The court held that since the school (a private institution) successfully attempted service and the plaintiff failed to respond to show-cause notices, the suspension and termination orders were legal and valid, rejecting claims of procedural violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  8. 08-Aug-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  9. 17-Jan-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    Cjjd I

  10. 28-Nov-2024

    Judgement

    Cjjd I

  11. 30-Aug-2024

    Judgement

    Cjjd I

  12. 11-Jul-2024

    Judgement

    Cjjd I

  13. 14-May-2024

    Order

    Cjjd I

  14. 25-Apr-2024

    Argument / Further Argument

    Cjjd I

  15. 05-Apr-2024

    Argument / Further Argument

    Cjjd I

  16. 22-Mar-2024

    Argument / Further Argument

    Cjjd I

  17. 06-Dec-2023

    Argument / Further Argument

    Cjjd I

  18. 24-Nov-2023

    Further Evidence

    Cjjd I

  19. 13-Sep-2023

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  20. 13-Jun-2023

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  21. 24-Mar-2023

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  22. 24-Nov-2022

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  23. 04-Aug-2022

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  24. 18-Feb-2022

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  25. 23-Dec-2021

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  26. 18-Feb-2021

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  27. 04-Jan-2021

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  28. 26-Aug-2020

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  29. 29-Apr-2020

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  30. 16-Mar-2020

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  31. 05-Dec-2019

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  32. 23-Sep-2019

    Further Evidence

  33. 08-Aug-2019

    OrderView PDF

  34. 08-Aug-2019

    Further Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  35. 14-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  36. 21-Dec-2018

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  37. 26-Jul-2018

    Evidence

    Cjjd III

  38. 07-May-2018

    Evidence

    Cjjd III

  39. 12-Mar-2018

    Evidence

    Cjjd III

  40. 12-Sep-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 22-Apr-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 154/2010

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit against Howard Memorial English School, finding that the school made proper attempts to serve the suspension and termination notices through registered post and personal delivery, and that the plaintiff intentionally avoided accepting them. The court held that since the school (a private institution) successfully attempted service and the plaintiff failed to respond to show-cause notices, the suspension and termination orders were legal and valid, rejecting claims of procedural violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case