Smt Ritali Banerjee vs Manju Chakraborty — 318/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: WBNP180003942024

Filing Number

396/2024

Filing Date

07-Oct-2024

Registration No

318/2024

Registration Date

07-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Divn. Bidhannagar

Judge

10-Civil Judge Jr Div

Last updated 08-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt Ritali Banerjee

    Adv. S Saha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manju Chakraborty

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  3. 18-Sep-2025

    Show Cause

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  4. 05-Jun-2025

    Show Cause

    Cjjd I

  5. 21-Jan-2025

    Show Cause

    Cjjd I

  6. 07-Oct-2024

    Ad - InterimView PDF

    Summary: The ad interim injunction petition in Title Suit 318 of 2024 was refused at this stage. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as no documentary evidence was produced to support the claim that the plaintiff's husband was a neurotic patient or that the gift deed was executed under coercion. Notice has been issued to defendants to show cause within 30 days why a temporary injunction should not be granted on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 07-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 318/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The ad interim injunction petition in Title Suit 318 of 2024 was refused at this stage. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as no documentary evidence was produced to support the claim that the plaintiff's husband was a neurotic patient or that the gift deed was executed under coercion. Notice has been issued to defendants to show cause within 30 days why a temporary injunction should not be granted on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case