MANAS KUMAR NEOGI vs BISHNU PADA NEOGI — 182/2020

Case under Amending Act – 1903 Section 34. Status: Show Cause. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Show Cause Next hearing 15-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: WBNP180002222020

Filing Number

222/2020

Filing Date

14-Oct-2020

Registration No

182/2020

Registration Date

14-Oct-2020

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Divn. Bidhannagar

Judge

10-Civil Judge Jr Div

Last updated 08-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Amending Act – 1903 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANAS KUMAR NEOGI

    Adv. AMBARNATH BHATTACHARJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BISHNU PADA NEOGI

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Show Cause

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  3. 26-Dec-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Cjjd I

  4. 26-Dec-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Cjjd I

  5. 19-Apr-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Cjjd I

  6. 19-Apr-2023

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  7. 10-Jan-2022

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  8. 06-May-2021

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  9. 04-Feb-2021

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  10. 14-Oct-2020

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary: The court granted an ad interim injunction in the form of status quo, directing all parties to maintain the nature, character, and possession of the suit property as it stands until 25.11.2020. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case and urgency warranted protection. Notice was issued to the defendant to show cause within 15 days why temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 14-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 14-Oct-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 182/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted an ad interim injunction in the form of status quo, directing all parties to maintain the nature, character, and possession of the suit property as it stands until 25.11.2020. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case and urgency warranted protection. Notice was issued to the defendant to show cause within 15 days why temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case