Smt kakali Sarkar vs Sri Showmit Mazumder — 23/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: WBNP180000322023
Filing Number
32/2023
Filing Date
18-Jan-2023
Registration No
23/2023
Registration Date
18-Jan-2023
Court
Civil Judge Jr. Divn. Bidhannagar
Judge
10-Civil Judge Jr Div
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt kakali Sarkar
Adv. E Sett
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri Showmit Mazumder
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
23-Dec-2024
Show Cause
Cjjd I
-
05-Sep-2024
Show Cause
Cjjd I
-
05-Jun-2024
Show Cause
Cjjd I
-
20-Feb-2024
Show Cause
Cjjd I
-
11-Sep-2023
Show Cause
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
03-Mar-2023
Show Cause
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
18-Jan-2023
Ad - InterimView PDF
Summary: In Title Suit No. 23 of 2023, the court refused to grant a temporary ad-interim injunction petition filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration and permanent injunction against the defendants. The court found no urgency in the matter, determined the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, and noted the defendants should be heard before any order is passed against them. Notice has been issued to defendant no. 1 to show cause within 20 days regarding why a temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 23/2023
Summary: In Title Suit No. 23 of 2023, the court refused to grant a temporary ad-interim injunction petition filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration and permanent injunction against the defendants. The court found no urgency in the matter, determined the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, and noted the defendants should be heard before any order is passed against them. Notice has been issued to defendant no. 1 to show cause within 20 days regarding why a temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts