Sm Papiya Dutta Mustafi vs Sri (Dr) Krishnendu Ghosh — 8/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: WBNP180000102023

Filing Number

10/2023

Filing Date

05-Jan-2023

Registration No

8/2023

Registration Date

05-Jan-2023

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Divn. Bidhannagar

Judge

10-Civil Judge Jr Div

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sm Papiya Dutta Mustafi

    Adv. P Sardar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri (Dr) Krishnendu Ghosh

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  3. 10-Nov-2025

    Show Cause

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  4. 22-May-2025

    Show Cause

    Cjjd I

  5. 15-Jan-2025

    Show Cause

    Cjjd I

  6. 11-Jul-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Cjjd I

  7. 11-Jan-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Cjjd I

  8. 09-Aug-2023

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  9. 18-May-2023

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  10. 21-Feb-2023

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Civil Judge Jr Div

  11. 05-Jan-2023

    Ad - InterimView PDF

    Summary: The court refused the plaintiff's temporary injunction petition on an ad-interim basis in Title Suit No. 08 of 2023. The court found no urgency in the matter and held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. Notice was issued to the defendant to show cause within 20 days why a temporary injunction should not be granted, and the case was adjourned to a future date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 05-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 05-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court refused the plaintiff's temporary injunction petition on an ad-interim basis in Title Suit No. 08 of 2023. The court found no urgency in the matter and held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. Notice was issued to the defendant to show cause within 20 days why a temporary injunction should not be granted, and the case was adjourned to a future date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case