Shreya Saha (Mitra) vs Pritam Saha — 969/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Maintenance Case - MR case for Maintenance

CNR: WBNP150056112023

Filing Number

8465/2023

Filing Date

13-Dec-2023

Registration No

969/2023

Registration Date

13-Dec-2023

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, North 24 Pgs.

Judge

12-Jm IV

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shreya Saha (Mitra)

    Adv. B. Biswas

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pritam Saha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 969/2023 Summary: The JM 4th Court, Barrackpore dismissed the petition filed by Shreya Saha (Mitra) against Pritam Saha for default on 16.03.2026. The petitioner was absent without steps, failed to file a show cause despite repeated calls, while the respondent appeared through counsel, leading the court to conclude the petitioner was unwilling to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm IV

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Show Cause

    Jm IV

  5. 15-Oct-2025

    Show Cause

    Jm IV

  6. 22-Aug-2025

    Order

    Jm IV

  7. 03-Jun-2025

    Order

    Jm IV

  8. 17-Apr-2025

    Order

    Jm IV

  9. 15-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Jm IV

  10. 21-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Jm IV

  11. 15-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Jm IV

  12. 13-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 13-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 969/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 969/2023 Summary: The JM 4th Court, Barrackpore dismissed the petition filed by Shreya Saha (Mitra) against Pritam Saha for default on 16.03.2026. The petitioner was absent without steps, failed to file a show cause despite repeated calls, while the respondent appeared through counsel, leading the court to conclude the petitioner was unwilling to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case